RFC 13 : SOS support

[Yewondwossen Assefa]

> 
> Would it have made sense to use the layer's group variable as the group 
> id instead of a metadata for the grouping?
> 
> I presume the other metadata for the group (name and description) will 
> be taken from the first layer in a given group in the mapfile, the same 
> way that this currently works for grouped WMS layers. Should this be 
> specified?
> 
> 

  It make sense. I have changed the RFC to reflect this.


> It's rare that this happens, I usually have good opinions on things, but 
> in this case I can't make my mind on whether this should be integrated 
> directly in MapServer or kept as a separate project built on top of 
> libmap.so. As I said and wrote in previous discussions, there as many 
> good reasons for than against direct integration.
> 
> So I'll vote +0 because I can't make my mind one way or the other. Note 
> that I am +1 on the rest of the implementation plan, so whatever the 
> rest of the group decides with respect to direct integration or not will 
> be good with me.
> 
> Daniel


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Assefa Yewondwossen
Software Analyst

Email: assefa at dmsolutions.ca
http://www.dmsolutions.ca/

Phone: (613) 565-5056 (ext 14)
Fax:   (613) 565-0925
----------------------------------------------------------------