PostGIS Bug 1587 (was Release Candidate 3)

Steve Lime steve.lime at DNR.STATE.MN.US
Thu Jan 19 10:10:01 EST 2006

I see no one from Refractions has commented one way or the other. It would be nice to get Paul or one of his technical folks to at least bless the patch before modifying their module. I think someone from that group still hangs out here occationally...


>>> Umberto Nicoletti <umberto.nicoletti at GMAIL.COM> 01/19/06 8:20 AM >>>
do you think this bug could be fixed before 4.8 gets out?

It's been there for a month and it looks like a trivial patch to me. I
have tested the patch on 4.6.2.

Best regards,

On 1/19/06, Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at> wrote:
> On 1/18/06, Steve Lime <steve.lime at> wrote:
> > Hi all: In case you weren't reading the WKT thread, Frank suggested doing a RC3 based on the latest flurry of changes. The WKT stuff hasn't really been tested broadly so it's worth it. Thoughts?
> >
> > I'm ready to cut a release once the source has been tagged.
> Steve,
> There are two recent bugs:
> I am wondering if we should push to fix them for 4.8 (in
> which case they ought to be fixed before RC3) or just leave
> them for 4.8.1.
> The WKT issues relate to fairly esoteric geometry types (in
> my mind), though they need to be fixed at some point.   The
> "imagemap" bug seems like it could affect alot of other things
> too if we are not ever using vsnprintf().  For instance handling
> of long error messages.   To me this is worth delaying the
> release (and RC3) for.
> Best regards,
> --
> ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
> I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at
> light and sound - activate the windows |
> and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent

More information about the mapserver-dev mailing list