Fix for bug #1629

[Daniel Morissette]

How confident are you that this is a safe change to backport to 4.8? Is
there any potential for side-effects?

How'bout we keep this in CVS head for now and include it only in 4.8.1
in a couple of weeks once we are confident that the CVS head changes
have been well tested and are safe to backport? I would hate to see
4.8.0 delayed again because of a last minute bug.

Talking about 4.8.0, can we release it later this week, let's say Thursday?

Daniel


Umberto Nicoletti wrote:
> It's in cvs head.
> 
> Umberto
> 
> On 1/31/06, Steve Lime <steve.lime at dnr.state.mn.us> wrote:
> 
>>I guess I'd say CVS head and see if we can get a few folks to test. Then backport upon confirmation. If that confirmation can happen quickly then including in 4.8 is ok with me.
>>
>>Steve
>>
>>
>>>>>Umberto Nicoletti <umberto.nicoletti at GMAIL.COM> 01/30/06 9:53 AM >>>
>>
>>I am working on a patch for bug #1629. Shall I commit to HEAD or the
>>latest 4.8 rc?
>>
>>I attach the patch in case comeone wants to give it a try (I already
>>did, anyway).
>>
>>Regards,
>>Umberto
> 
>>
> 


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
  Daniel Morissette               dmorissette at dmsolutions.ca
  DM Solutions Group              http://www.dmsolutions.ca/
------------------------------------------------------------