Voting on RFC 9.
steve.lime at DNR.STATE.MN.US
Tue Jan 31 11:54:19 EST 2006
I did spend just a little time looking at clearsilver. Seems nice, especially with flow control- definitely a 5.0 type of modification. Doesn't seem to excell with variable formatting though which is what I'm after.
>>> Steve Lime <steve.lime at DNR.STATE.MN.US> 01/31/06 9:24 AM >>>
I gotta get some work done at my real job and this gets most of the way there and only took a few hours. Ripping out the current templating system would take a tad longer. You do the math...
>>> Sean Gillies <sgillies at FRII.COM> 01/31/06 8:03 AM >>>
+0 from me. I think your/our time is better spent making mapscript
better and using mapscript with existing Perl/Python/PHP templating
packages, but you know that already. For C, there is Clearsilver
Maybe a switch to something like clearsilver would be a good 5.0
On Jan 30, 2006, at 10:51 PM, Steve Lime wrote:
> So far only one +1 (me), and one +0 (Frank). I've got this ready to
> go =
> into 4.9 with one more thumbs up. Anyone?
> I'd like to get it committed and move on to something else.
More information about the mapserver-dev