Voting on RFC 9.

[Steve Lime]

I did spend just a little time looking at clearsilver. Seems nice, especially with flow control- definitely a 5.0 type of modification. Doesn't seem to excell with variable formatting though which is what I'm after.

Steve

>>> Steve Lime <steve.lime at DNR.STATE.MN.US> 01/31/06 9:24 AM >>>
I gotta get some work done at my real job and this gets most of the way there and only took a few hours. Ripping out the current templating system would take a tad longer. You do the math...

Steve

>>> Sean Gillies <sgillies at FRII.COM> 01/31/06 8:03 AM >>>
http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/development/rfc/ms-rfc-9/ 

+0 from me. I think your/our time is better spent making mapscript  
better and using mapscript with existing Perl/Python/PHP templating  
packages, but you know that already. For C, there is Clearsilver

   http://www.clearsilver.net/ 

Maybe a switch to something like clearsilver would be a good 5.0  
feature.

Sean

On Jan 30, 2006, at 10:51 PM, Steve Lime wrote:

> So far only one +1 (me), and one +0 (Frank). I've got this ready to  
> go =
> into 4.9 with one more thumbs up. Anyone?
>
> I'd like to get it committed and move on to something else.
>
> Steve