Voting on RFC 9.

Tamas Szekeres szekeres.tamas at FREEMAIL.HU
Tue Jan 31 18:17:48 EST 2006


Please consider

http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1634

as a potential candidate to RFC9

Tamas



On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 07:03:15 -0700, Sean Gillies <sgillies at FRII.COM> wrote:

>http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/development/rfc/ms-rfc-9/
>
>+0 from me. I think your/our time is better spent making mapscript
>better and using mapscript with existing Perl/Python/PHP templating
>packages, but you know that already. For C, there is Clearsilver
>
>   http://www.clearsilver.net/
>
>Maybe a switch to something like clearsilver would be a good 5.0
>feature.
>
>Sean
>
>On Jan 30, 2006, at 10:51 PM, Steve Lime wrote:
>
>> So far only one +1 (me), and one +0 (Frank). I've got this ready to
>> go =
>> into 4.9 with one more thumbs up. Anyone?
>>
>> I'd like to get it committed and move on to something else.
>>
>> Steve



More information about the mapserver-dev mailing list