Newer Swig versions...

[thomas bonfort]

yep, my bad ...
.29 isn't in unstable yet, so I don't  know if this was fixed
tb

On 7/12/06, Steve Lime <Steve.Lime at dnr.state.mn.us> wrote:
>
> There is a 1.3.29 I think.
>
> Steve
>
> >>> thomas bonfort <thomas.bonfort at GMAIL.COM> 7/12/2006 10:50:03 AM >>>
> just my 2c
> latest swig (1.3.28) prevents python mapscript from being properly
> executed:
> ImportError: ../../build/lib.linux-i686-2.3/_mapscript.so: undefined
> symbol:
> intarray_setitem
> see also http://trac.gispython.org/projects/PCL/ticket/44
>
> this is not the case with 1.3.24 (or .27 according to the previous link)
>
> cheers
>
>
>
> On 7/12/06, Daniel Morissette <dmorissette at mapgears.com> wrote:
> >
> > Steve Lime wrote:
> > > Hi all: Currently all distributions comming off cvs.gis.umn.edu are
> > being build with Swig 1.3.21. I'm just wondering what folks think about
> > moving to the latest versions. Has anyone played with MapScript
> generated by
> > the new version?
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> >
> > I haven't played with SWIG much lately so I do not have an opinion on
> > the upgrade, but I think we should generate the 4.8.4 release before
> > doing the switch just to be safe.
> >
> > BTW, I will prepare the 4.8.4 source for the release later today and
> > will let you know when it's ready to package.
> >
> > Daniel
> > --
> > Daniel Morissette
> > http://www.mapgears.com/
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-dev/attachments/20060712/504a15bc/attachment.html