RFC-24 Mapscript memory management: call for votes

[Umberto Nicoletti]

Tamas,
since when we don't count SteveW's vote?
I see he's voted (and his vote been counted) in other rfcs (19 and 16,
for example).

Umberto

On 4/2/07, Tamas Szekeres <szekerest at gmail.com> wrote:
> Umberto,
>
> According to #6 only members of the Technical Steering Committee's
> votes will be counted so you should wait for another +1 from a TSC
> member before announcing the results and committing the changes,
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tamas
>
>
> 2007/4/2, Umberto Nicoletti <umberto.nicoletti at gmail.com>:
> > Currently the voting request has been on line for over a week and it
> > is going as follows:
> >
> > +2 (me, Stephen Woodbridge)
> > +0 Frank Warmerdam
> >
> > I have reread RFC1, and according to item 7 I can consider it approved
> > even though I'd hoped to see some more votes.
> >
> > Anyway, I'll update the rfc with a compatibility section to comply
> > with Stephen's requirements and then I'll start committing changes. I
> > should be done by next week (sunday 14) because of Easter and some
> > other projects' deadlines in this week.
> >
> > Thanks to all,
> > Umberto
> >
> > On 3/24/07, Umberto Nicoletti <umberto.nicoletti at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I took some time to update the RFC text at:
> > >
> > > http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/development/rfc/ms-rfc-24
> > >
> >
>