exporting layers to OGC interfaces
Stephen Woodbridge
woodbri at SWOODBRIDGE.COM
Thu Feb 22 08:51:26 EST 2007
Paul Ramsey wrote:
>
> On 21-Feb-07, at 6:59 PM, Stephen Woodbridge wrote:
>
[snip]
>
>> 5.0 is a compatibility breaking release I thought.
>
> Is it? Best bring that out early and figure out what paradigms are on
> the slab.
Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought this has been brought on the dev list
in the past. Well the one major thing that has been discussed is
mapscript. So requiring an additional tag in the mapfile seems small in
comparison.
>> I do not think we should break compatibility just for the sake of
>> breaking it, but I do think we should do whatever is needed to clean
>> things up, rationalize APIs and interfaces and position mapserver for
>> the next 5 years.
>
> That's a bigger remit than I thought this release was taking on, but if
> it is truly so, by all means...
I think this has been discussed as part of the mapscript changes and
RFC-24 and some others. But discussions are just that, and not
necessarily decisions. And maybe we are backing off that. I'll let Steve
and others jump in at this point.
-Steve
More information about the mapserver-dev
mailing list