Motion to move Feature Freeze to July 23rd

[Frank Warmerdam]

Daniel Morissette wrote:
> Personally I think of a RFC as exactly what you describe as developer 
> docs. I think it should be a requirement of a RFC to contain enough 
> information and examples for users to be able to use it, so if you have 
> a specific RFC in mind that doesn't contain enough information then 
> perhaps this RFC needs an update.
> 
> Don't get me wrong, I'm not against better organized dev docs, but we'd 
> need a volunteer to take the lead on that... and at least in the 
> meantime we have RFCs.

Steve,

I'm kind of with Daniel on this.  In particular, I don't want a new
class of intermediate developer generated documentation to manage.  I
think we should either "put it in the RFC" or draft it directly into the
final documentation.

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org