Thoughts on a feature cache for queries...

[Frank Warmerdam]

>>>> Tamas Szekeres <szekerest at GMAIL.COM> 06/06/07 1:03 PM >>>
> Steve,
> 
> I continue to think that the layervtable is the most feasible place
> where this effort can easily be undertaken. In the recent days I've
> just been planning to make some tests in this regard and find out how
> to simplify RFC22 to show that this implementation isn't as large as
> it seems at the first sight (I consider that was the primary reason of
> the abstention from this idea so far, shoulda' recall that thread
> again).

Tamas,

It seems that our timetable for 5.0 is winding down, and I think
implementing an overhauled RFC 22 could be challenging.  However, I'll
hold off on producing a query-cache specific RFC if you feel strongly
about presenting a more general solution in the 5.0 time frame.

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org