Thoughts on a feature cache for queries...

[Tamas Szekeres]

Frank,

I'll have a crack at that issue this weekend.

Best regards,

Tamas



2007/6/8, Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com>:
> >>>> Tamas Szekeres <szekerest at GMAIL.COM> 06/06/07 1:03 PM >>>
> > Steve,
> >
> > I continue to think that the layervtable is the most feasible place
> > where this effort can easily be undertaken. In the recent days I've
> > just been planning to make some tests in this regard and find out how
> > to simplify RFC22 to show that this implementation isn't as large as
> > it seems at the first sight (I consider that was the primary reason of
> > the abstention from this idea so far, shoulda' recall that thread
> > again).
>
> Tamas,
>
> It seems that our timetable for 5.0 is winding down, and I think
> implementing an overhauled RFC 22 could be challenging.  However, I'll
> hold off on producing a query-cache specific RFC if you feel strongly
> about presenting a more general solution in the 5.0 time frame.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
> I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
> and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
>