Vote on RFC 31?

[Stephen Woodbridge]

Catching up on my reading...

I'm +1, this sounds like a good simplification of the code that will add 
some nice capabilities.

-Steve W

Steve Lime wrote:
> Hi all: I'd like to call for a vote on RFC 31. I updated the RFC to
> try and deal with the points raised. The most significant addition
> was more elaboration on security related to URL parameter setting. I
> propose a URLCONFIG parameter addition to the webObj that has dual
> purposes, 1) to allow URL configuration and 2) to further filter the
> config string.
> 
> The RFC does not address writing to strings as mentioned by Tamas
> (although I think it's a neat idea).
> 
> Please let me know if there are additional concerns, suggestions or
> clarifications necessary.
> 
> Steve (I'm +1 BTW)