Call for vote on MS-RFC-27: Label Priority

[Frank Warmerdam]

Daniel Morissette wrote:
> I have included all the feedback received so far in RFC-27:
> 
> http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/development/rfc/ms-rfc-27
> 
> We didn't hear much comments in support of doing a sort of cache entries 
> instead of using a fixed number of cache slots, so I'll assume that we 
> are okay with the current approach of a fixed number of 
> MS_MAX_LABEL_PRIORITY PRIORITY levels.
> 
> Unless anyone has more comments, I'd like to open the vote to adopt 
> RFC-27 with a +1.

+1

-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org