Call for comments -RFC 39

[Yewondwossen Assefa]

Bart van den Eijnden wrote:
> Hi Assefa,
> 
> so the CLASSGROUP would act as the default style if there are classes
> within the same LAYER with different GROUPs defined? Maybe mention
> this explicitly in the proposal.
> 

  Yes. I will explicitly add this.

> Also, styles can have a title and an abstract next to a name. How
> would one set this? Using METADATA like "wms_style_myclassgroup_title"
> etc.?
> 

  I realize that but wanted to use for now the style name as the title. 
Using a metadata is a good idea I think

> Basically I feel the need for a higher object, something like THEME or
> CLASSIFICATION which groups together a set of classes. This would also
> make it easier to re-use blocks of classes between several layers
> without having to copy/paste them. But I can understand if this is
> outside of the scope of this RFC :-)
> 
  I agree with this, I think this is what Steve raised too and I hope I 
mostly answered to this in that e-mail.


Thnaks

> Best regards,
> Bart
> 
> On Nov 15, 2007 3:50 PM, Yewondwossen Assefa <yassefa at dmsolutions.ca> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>   I have put together an RFC outlining changes that could be done to be
>> able to support Named styles in WMS/SLD. I would appreciate your
>> comments on it:
>>
>>    http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/development/rfc/ms-rfc-39
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> --
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Assefa Yewondwossen
>> Software Analyst
>>
>> Email: assefa at dmsolutions.ca
>> http://www.dmsolutions.ca/
>>
>> Phone: (613) 565-5056 (ext 14)
>> Fax:   (613) 565-0925
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
> 


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Assefa Yewondwossen
Software Analyst

Email: assefa at dmsolutions.ca
http://www.dmsolutions.ca/

Phone: (613) 565-5056 (ext 14)
Fax:   (613) 565-0925
----------------------------------------------------------------