[mapserver-dev] RFC 26

[Steve Lime]

No, it looks like the main bug that was used to track it (#2119) was never turned over to the
documentation component after implementation.

Steve

>>> On 7/16/2008 at 12:29 PM, in message
<9AD33D2D-5C03-4F07-A2FC-D1B54D4937FA at gatewaygeomatics.com>, Jeff McKenna
<jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote:
> Am I correct that no documentation bugs were created when the changes  
> from RFC#26 (opacity, scaledenom, symbol pattern) were implemented?   
> Someone gets a big wrist-slap from me if that is so.
> 
> -jeff
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org 
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev