[mapserver-dev] 5.2 Release Plan (Proposed date changes)

[Kralidis,Tom [Burlington]]

+1

..Tom
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org 
> [mailto:mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of 
> Stephen Woodbridge
> Sent: 01 June, 2008 12:42 PM
> To: Steve Lime
> Cc: mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [mapserver-dev] 5.2 Release Plan (Proposed date changes)
> 
> It is hard to interpret silence. With the weather turning 
> nice, people may not be sitting at their computers or be able 
> to commit the time in the short term to tackle the bugs 
> because of other project work, or something else all together.
> 
> Anyway, it would be helpful to Steve if people can check in 
> with what they can do by when. Or if they have even had a 
> chance to look over their respective lists.
> 
> I'm +1 to rolling back the date.
> 
> -Steve W
> 
> Steve Lime wrote:
> > I didn't get much feedback on the dates other than one "the 
> number of 
> > bugs seems high" so I'd like to propose pushing everything back a 
> > week. That means a feature freeze on the 6th and beta-1 on the 11th.
> > If we do a 5.0.3 next week then that would show a lot of 
> activity to 
> > the community...
> > 
> > I'll start with a +1.
> > 
> > Steve
> > 
> > -----Original Message----- From:
> > mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org on behalf of Steve Lime Sent:
> > Fri 30-May-08 00:39 To: mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org Subject:
> > [mapserver-dev] 5.2 Release Plan
> > 
> > Hi all: I've copied the work Dan did for 5.0 and updated it for 5.2.
> > It's at:
> > 
> > 
> http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/development/release_plans/mapserver_5_2/r
> > elease_plan
> > 
> > 
> > Many of the RFCs referenced were included because they said 
> they were 
> > planned for 5.2 but I don't know if they were actually implemented.
> > Please let me know. My work on RFC 36 is 95% complete so 
> it's ready to 
> > go for this release. The tiling work Paul did looks to be 
> there, SQL 
> > Server support and the WCS 1.1.x support are in as well, 
> just not sure 
> > about the others. If folks have suggestions about features to 
> > highlight please speak up. Some that come to mind:
> > 
> > - fuzzy AGG label outlines - performance fixes for shapefiles - 
> > style-level opacity (AGG) - new WFS support (?) - WCS 1.0 compliance
> > (?) - pre-clip label point computation - extent/bounds (e.g. shpext,
> > mapext) tag attribute handling
> > 
> > Now, we supposedly have a feature freeze at the end of the day 
> > tomorrow. There are still a boat load of tickets out there (150 
> > non-documentation/website). That seems high to me, too high 
> to release 
> > a beta next week. What do folks think?
> > 
> > We need to make adjustments and then approve this plan.
> > 
> > Steve _______________________________________________ mapserver-dev 
> > mailing list mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org 
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> mapserver-dev mailing 
> > list mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org 
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> mapserver-dev mailing 
> > list mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org 
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>