[mapserver-dev] update to rfc7 required?

[Steve Lime]

I think it looks good. That said, is this a good time to review the legal section? One change in that
section is that folks are committing code under the MapServer license which isn't strictly MIT/X11. As
a result of OSGeo incubation several other projects have developed formal contributor agreements
that we might want to compare that section against.

Steve

>>> On 6/25/2008 at 9:27 AM, in message
<2DC5CCA14756424BBBEE8B4B2E4A682F03BCC23C at ecburexch1.ontario.int.ec.gc.ca>,
"Kralidis,Tom [Burlington]" <Tom.Kralidis at ec.gc.ca> wrote:

> All: based on Frank's input, here is the updated text:
> 
> http://devgeo.cciw.ca/ms_tmp/ms-rfc-7.1.txt 
> 
> ..Tom
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org on behalf of Kralidis,Tom 
> [Burlington]
> Sent: Wed 25-Jun-08 09:44
> To: mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org 
> Subject: RE: [mapserver-dev] update to rfc7 required?
>  
> 
> Kralidis,Tom [Burlington] wrote:
>> See http://devgeo.cciw.ca/ms_tmp/ms-rfc-7.tgz, which has an updated RFC 7.1
>> as well as an svn diff output from mapserver/rfc/ms-rfc-7.txt.  For review
>> and comment.
> 
> All: a bit more user friendly:
> 
> http://devgeo.cciw.ca/ms_tmp/ms-rfc-7.txt.diff 
> 
> http://devgeo.cciw.ca/ms_tmp/ms-rfc-7.txt 
> 
> ..Tom
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org 
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org 
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev