[mapserver-dev] Support for the MapInfo style zoom layeringoption.

[Steve Lime]

We could establish precedence, if either of the scale values are set, then use those. If not, then check width.
That way you'd need just the two new members...

Steve

>>> On 6/25/2008 at 5:46 PM, in message
<f3b73b7d0806251546s3a82f8c8t9d1fbca169d2fb2a at mail.gmail.com>, "Tamas Szekeres"
<szekerest at gmail.com> wrote:
> Daniel,
> 
> 2008/6/26 Daniel Morissette <dmorissette at mapgears.com>:
>> Tamas Szekeres wrote:
>>>
>>> Did you mean by adding 3 extra members to the layerObj or you are
>>> thinking about adding these new keywords only to the parser and the
>>> specified MINWIDTH/MAXWIDTH values would eventually be stored in the
>>> current minscaledemom/maxscaledenom members?
>>>
>>
>> I meant also adding 2 new members in the layerObj as well... I think this is
>> more or less what you initially suggested, right?
>>
> 
> Yes that is exactly what I was proposing. How we distinguish between
> these 2 methods, should we think about an internal 'unspecified'
> value?
> like minwidth = -1 would mean that this parameter shouldn't actually
> be taken into account in msLayerIsVisible.
> 
> Tamas
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org 
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev