Steve.Lime at dnr.state.mn.us
Mon Oct 6 17:57:16 EDT 2008
Maybe a real short one, just because it's related to core, and potentially hazardous portions
of the code. Steve W. had some good suggestions and it's tough to tell where things are
at with the ticket.
>>> On 10/3/2008 at 5:29 PM, in message
<30fe546d0810031529i3012508cpedbeb6ba0ef90f3b at mail.gmail.com>, "Paul Ramsey"
<pramsey at cleverelephant.ca> wrote:
> I've moved this to an enhancement ticket. Do you feel this is RFC worthy?
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 5:42 AM, Jeff McKenna
>> <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote:
>>>> Is there a reason that IGNORE_MISSING_DATA is a compile-time option? I
>>>> have a client request to make it a run-time option, and also add the
>>>> ability to run-time configure to error out in the case of WMS client
>>>> layers that fail.
>>> Yes I definitely agree with the need for this. I give a strong +1 for this
>>> potential RFC.
>> Great, I'll write it up !
>>> By the way Paul you got strong applause when the Sol Katz award for you was
>>> announced, and everyone liked your video. Congrats!
>> Thanks Jeff!
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the mapserver-dev