[mapserver-dev] Any reaction to the 5.4 release plan?

[Tamas Szekeres]

Yes, the first one would be easier to implement by eliminating to realloc
the items array at each subsequent items.
I originally didn't want to add that TEXT hack since the mapscript users are
already able to set the items of the features programmatically.

Tamas



2009/2/4 Daniel Morissette <dmorissette at mapgears.com>

> Tamas Szekeres wrote:
>
>> Steve,
>>
>>
>> I would support to have http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/2870implemented (or something like this) in this release.
>> It's a small change though, it would establish an option is to have a
>> certain set of the items retrieved and bypass msLayerWhichItems in some
>> cases. This would also be essential if we think about caching the features
>> for later use in the future additions.
>>
>>
> In this ticket, instead of hijacking the TEXT member of the inline features
> for the attributes, would it not be better to add a new/explicit ITEMS
> parameter for that?
>
> Either
>
>    FEATURE
>        POINTS -0.2 51.5 END
>        ITEMS "value1;value2;value2"
>    END
>
> or
>
>    FEATURE
>        POINTS -0.2 51.5 END
>        ITEMS
>          "value1"
>          "value2"
>          "value3"
>        END
>    END
>
>
> --
> Daniel Morissette
> http://www.mapgears.com/
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-dev/attachments/20090204/0c66eeb2/attachment.html