[mapserver-dev] Call for vote on RFC 65...

[Lime, Steve D (DNR)]

Damn, missed that last argument. I'll obviously wait for your (or Frank's) feedback... An explicit result set id may do the trick.

Have fun sledding, in fact, we just did a snowmobiling map (MS 6.0, tilecache):

  http://www.mndnr.gov/snowmobiling/interactive_map/index.html

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Morissette
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 2:17 PM
To: Lime, Steve D (DNR)
Cc: 'MapServer Dev Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [mapserver-dev] Call for vote on RFC 65...

Lime, Steve D (DNR) wrote:
> Hopefully you guys can ponder it. When I looked at OGR the implementation of getShape and resultGetShape where identical.
> 

Identical except for the last argument to msOGRFileGetShape() which is
the one that triggers the global vs resultset mode.

> Also note that since I propose passing a resultCacheMemberObj around instead of individual id's we could support 3 ids: shape, tile and resultset.
> 

I'll have to have another look, but unfortunately I have to leave in a
few minutes for my first skidoo weekend of the season: gotta go check
out if there really is snow in the mountains... ;)

-- 
Daniel Morissette
http://www.mapgears.com/
_______________________________________________
mapserver-dev mailing list
mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev