[mapserver-dev] RFC 64 - Call for a vote...
Yewondwossen Assefa
yassefa at dmsolutions.ca
Tue Nov 30 16:13:31 EST 2010
Yes are right, the buffered shape should not be necessary. I think It
is like this now simply because the distance parameter could not passed
to the query function. I don't think that will be an issue with the
new implementation but I will make sure that it respects this.
best regards,
On 30/11/2010 3:25 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Yewondwossen Assefa
> <yassefa at dmsolutions.ca> wrote:
>> On 29/11/2010 10:24 PM, Lime, Steve D (DNR) wrote:
>> The current
>> implementation of these operators uses msGEOSDistance with a buffered shape
>> (buffered shape is created using the distance).
> Not
>
> distance(A,Buffer(B,d))> 0 implies ! dwithin
>
> instead of
>
> distance(A,B)> d implies ! dwithin
>
> I hope. Shouldn't run the buffer op unless you actually need the
> derived geometry
>
> P
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Assefa Yewondwossen
Software Analyst
Email: yassefa at dmsolutions.ca
http://www.dmsolutions.ca/
Phone: (613) 565-5056 (ext 14)
Fax: (613) 565-0925
----------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the mapserver-dev
mailing list