[mapserver-dev] Expanding the MapServer Project
jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com
Fri Mar 25 10:50:25 EDT 2011
My point is that I am aware of TinyOWS only supporting one database
connection, so I think that before the MapServer PSC adopts TinyOWS we
should have a clear plan of what we/TinyOWS would support. We must be
aware that users of OGR-supported-databases with MapServer will assume
that all OGR formats are accepted for WFS-T. So my point is that this
is a significant amount of work (I believe Daniel reinforced my
assumption on this in a previous email).
On 11-03-25 11:01 AM, Stephen Woodbridge wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> While I can not speak to the technical aspects of this, and this is
> probably a good discussion to have at some point, I thought that these
> type of decisions and discussion would happen under the mapserver PSC
> governance on how to move these projects forward after we decided to
> merge these projects.
> Would you see lack of OGR support as a show stopper for merging the
> projects? Why?
> Or are you just thinking about the next steps and starting a discussion
> on what we do next?
More information about the mapserver-dev