[mapserver-dev] Expanding the MapServer Project

Jeff McKenna jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com
Fri Mar 25 10:50:25 EDT 2011

Hi SteveW,

My point is that I am aware of TinyOWS only supporting one database 
connection, so I think that before the MapServer PSC adopts TinyOWS we 
should have a clear plan of what we/TinyOWS would support.  We must be 
aware that users of OGR-supported-databases with MapServer will assume 
that all OGR formats are accepted for WFS-T.  So my point is that this 
is a significant amount of work (I believe Daniel reinforced my 
assumption on this in a previous email).


On 11-03-25 11:01 AM, Stephen Woodbridge wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> While I can not speak to the technical aspects of this, and this is
> probably a good discussion to have at some point, I thought that these
> type of decisions and discussion would happen under the mapserver PSC
> governance on how to move these projects forward after we decided to
> merge these projects.
> Would you see lack of OGR support as a show stopper for merging the
> projects? Why?
> Or are you just thinking about the next steps and starting a discussion
> on what we do next?

More information about the mapserver-dev mailing list