[mapserver-dev] Suggestion: Add more documentation groups to trac

[Havard Tveite]

I have now moved Mapscript documentation tickets from
"Documentation - MapServer" to "Documentation - MapScript"

Håvard

On 1/31/2012 4:55 PM, Lime, Steve D (DNR) wrote:
> The documentation components look like this now:
>
> Documentation - MapCache
> Documentation - MapScript
> Documentation - MapServer
> Documentation - mapserver.org
> Documentation - TinyOWS
>
> The MapServer and mapserver.org ones where created by renaming existing components. I didn't add the language specific ones yet since there was no obvious owner that I knew of.
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Morissette
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 12:34 PM
> To: mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [mapserver-dev] Suggestion: Add more documentation groups to trac
>
> Works for me.
>
>
> On 12-01-24 1:20 PM, Lime, Steve D (DNR) wrote:
>> An objection if I set these up?
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Alan Boudreault
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:45 PM
>> To: mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> Subject: Re: [mapserver-dev] Suggestion: Add more documentation groups to trac
>>
>> Great idea!
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> On 12-01-17 03:55 PM, Lime, Steve D (DNR) wrote:
>>> I'm fine with this proposal. The input and output drivers follow a similar naming convention.
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Havard Tveite
>>> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 4:17 AM
>>> To: 'MapServer Dev Mailing List'
>>> Subject: [mapserver-dev] Suggestion: Add more documentation groups to trac
>>>
>>> Dear MapServer developers (Jeff in particular),
>>>
>>> I think it would be useful to have more Mapserver Documentation
>>> components in trac.  That way it would be easier to organise
>>> tickets.  I raise the issue now that the MapServer project has
>>> been extended with TinyOWS and MapCache, adding to the
>>> complexity.
>>>
>>> I have been trying to help improve the MapServer documentation,
>>> and I have found that it would be convenient for me to be able
>>> to classify the documentation tickets a bit.
>>> I have, for instance often only partly fixed MapServer tickets
>>> by updating the documentation for "core" MapServer, leaving the
>>> MapScript part to others.  In such cases, it would be nice to
>>> be able to "clean the desk" by moving the ticket somewhere
>>> else.
>>> Trac components seem to be the most convenient way to handle
>>> this.
>>>
>>> I would suggest that TinyOWS and MapCache get their own
>>> documentation components.  I would also like to have a
>>> new component for MapScript, and for the translations.
>>> These are my suggestions for the new group of Mapserver
>>> documentation components (I think it is a good idea to let
>>> them all start with "Documentation", as that will make
>>> them easy to find when filing tickets):
>>>
>>> Documentation - MapServer
>>> Documentation - MapCache
>>> Documentation - MapScript
>>> Documentation - TinyOWS
>>> Documentation - de
>>> Documentation - fr
>>> Documentation - cn
>>>
>>>
>>> What do you say, Jeff?
>>>
>>> Håvard