[mapserver-dev] move to github ?

[thomas bonfort]

Given Daniel's last email and subsequent discussions on IRC, I am not
under the impression that consensus has been reached on the issue. I
am therefore reluctant to call for a vote on the transition as I
believe it is a sufficiently impacting change that this consensus
should be reached beforehand.

Supposing the rfc passes with a move to github, wether existing
tickets are imported or not, I have the scripts necessary to migrate
ready, and would only need the couple of devs who don't have a github
account yet to create one so that commits can be matched to them.
Staying on osgeo trac would take longer as the trac instance needs to
be upgraded, and I suspect that plugging git in with the different
osgeo ldap groups is going to be problematic.

regards,
thomas

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 21:58, Lime, Steve D (DNR)
<Steve.Lime at state.mn.us> wrote:
> Ok, what next? I sound's like Dan's concerns are mostly addressed, so how can I help!
>
> Steve
>
> ________________________________________
> From: mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] on behalf of Olivier Courtin [olivier.courtin at oslandia.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 9:18 AM
> To: mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [mapserver-dev] move to github ?
>
> On Mar 28, 2012, at 10:53 AM, thomas bonfort wrote:
>
> Thomas,
>
>> I see no mentions from osgeo that we should use their infrastructure
>> to host the codebase. From
>> http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/principles.html :
>
>> [...]
>> Projects are responsible for reviewing and controlling their code
>> bases to insure the integrity of the open source baselines.
>> [...]
>> Projects should maintain a source code management system.
>> Projects should maintain an issue tracking system.
>
> Yeap this rules are written in order to be sure we reach the goals
> rather than focus on how we reach them.
>
> But i still think it will be simpler to reach them, if we keep
> real control on the beneath solution.
>
> Obviously as long as OsGeo keep providing us a decent
> infrastructure.
>
> But anyhow, i will not interfere on a move
> (cf my -0 )
>
> --
> Olivier
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev