[mapserver-dev] Label positioning around points
Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)
bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us
Fri Sep 21 08:37:18 PDT 2012
All,
Is this possibly a situation for setting up a user defined external resource file (like FONTS or SYMBOLS for setting the order via these types of 3x3 matrix definitions? Then everyone is right (or wrong??)
Bobb
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mapserver-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapserver-
>> dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Christy Nieman
>> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 10:35 AM
>> To: mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> Subject: Re: [mapserver-dev] Label positioning around points
>>
>> I suppose then this brings back possibly having a user-defined
>> "Auto" order?
>>
>> On 09/21/2012 11:31 AM, Daniel Morissette wrote:
>> > On 12-09-21 11:28 AM, Christy Nieman wrote:
>> >> I don't think they should be skipped, but UC and LC are, in my
>> >> experience, not ideal point label locations. As far as I
>> know, the 4
>> >> corners should be considered first (specific order is open for
>> debate
>> >> in the reading I've done).
>> >>
>> >
>> > Actually, it may just be a matter of taste, but I am of the
>> opposite
>> > opinion. Looking at the two images attached to #4242, I find
>> that the
>> > labels in position UC look better than in *L or *R positions:
>> >
>> > http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/attachment/ticket/4249/label-
>> placement
>> > -auto.png
>> >
>> > http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/attachment/ticket/4249/label-
>> placement
>> > -auto-new.png
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapserver-dev mailing list
>> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
More information about the mapserver-dev
mailing list