[mapserver-dev] RFC 101: Content Dependant Legend Rendering

[thomas bonfort]

Steve,
How should we be detecting that we need a content dependant legend for
mode=legend. I'm not sure that checking we have size/extent parameters
in the url makes sense in this case, should we rather be adding a
mode=contentdependantlegend (or a shorter/nicer mode name) ?

thanks,
thomas

On 19 July 2013 15:54, thomas bonfort <thomas.bonfort at gmail.com> wrote:
> Mike,
> Aside from funding, there are none. I'll look into it anyhow, as I
> don't believe it will be very complex to add.
>
> --
> thomas
>
> On 19 July 2013 15:51, Smith, Michael ERDC-RDE-CRREL-NH
> <Michael.Smith at erdc.dren.mil> wrote:
>> Is there a reason to not support this for MapServer mode=legend calls?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On 7/19/13 9:49 AM, "thomas bonfort" <thomas.bonfort at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Devs,
>>>Please find RFC 101 which proposes an extension to GetLegendRequest
>>>image results to only include legend icons for features that are
>>>actually present in a given map view
>>>
>>>https://github.com/mapserver/docs/blob/5398e449f6307419e2557a5a5ca0404bab8
>>>27728/en/development/rfc/ms-rfc-101.txt
>>>
>>>and soon at: http://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-101.html
>>>
>>>I'll be calling for vote on it next week, in time for our upcoming 6.4
>>>feature-freeze.
>>>
>>>Best regards,
>>>Thomas
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>mapserver-dev mailing list
>>>mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>>