[mapserver-dev] MS RFC 107: Support for the edge of pixel (OGC) extent model in MapServer
szekerest at gmail.com
Wed Jan 1 08:24:55 PST 2014
Yes, predefined constants seem to be a good option both for the mapfile and
mapscript to make it more self-explanatory.
2014/1/1 Norman Vine <nhv at cape.com>
> On Jan 1, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri at swoodbridge.com>
> On 1/1/2014 9:43 AM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
> Hi Devs,
> Happy New Year All!
> According to this thread
> I've ringed in to write an RFC about the proposed changes.
> Please find RFC-107 for review submitted to the documentation tree:
> Let me know about your suggestions.
> Nicely written RFC, very clear and easy to follow.
> One minor comment, while I assume the mapfile parser will validate the
> values of PIXELADJUSTMENT, you probably need to make sure they are
> validated in the mapscript call to fit() to make sure someone does not pass
> bogus values to that.
> Or introduce another two keywords to the lexer
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the mapserver-dev