[mapserver-dev] MS RFC 107: Support for the edge of pixel (OGC) extent model in MapServer

[Tamas Szekeres]

Yes, predefined constants seem to be a good option both for the mapfile and
mapscript to make it more self-explanatory.

Tamas


2014/1/1 Norman Vine <nhv at cape.com>

>
> On Jan 1, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri at swoodbridge.com>
> wrote:
>
> On 1/1/2014 9:43 AM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
>
> Hi Devs,
>
> Happy New Year All!
>
> According to this thread
> <
> http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Questions-regarding-to-the-extent-scale-calculations-in-MapServer-td5091493.html
> >
> I've ringed in to write an RFC about the proposed changes.
> Please find RFC-107 for review submitted to the documentation tree:
> http://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-107.html
>
> Let me know about your suggestions.
>
>
> Tamas,
>
> Nicely written RFC, very clear and easy to follow.
>
> One minor comment, while I assume the mapfile parser will validate the
> values of PIXELADJUSTMENT, you probably need to make sure they are
> validated in the mapscript call to fit() to make sure someone does not pass
> bogus values to that.
>
>
> Or introduce another two keywords to the lexer
>
> PIXEL_CENTER
> PIXEL_EDGE
>
> Norman
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-dev/attachments/20140101/181c710d/attachment.html>