[mapserver-dev] Draft proposal for 8.0 - Site Context FIles
Steve Lime
sdlime at gmail.com
Mon Apr 5 14:57:03 PDT 2021
Could add support for both at some point. Starting with a mapserv-like
format doesn't preclude JSON - although initial versions tend to stick
around. I don't know that JSON adds that much to a config file - mapfiles
would be another matter. Just my 2 cents... Note PoC branch has been
updated.
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 9:06 AM Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) <
bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us> wrote:
> *I know more work, but what about doing both formats for some number of
> versions? Speaking as an old-fart MapServer user, I’m inclined to go the
> MapServer like format, but I’m sure new folks coming into the fold would
> better appreciate a JSON approach.*
>
>
>
> *Another thought, rather than have two formats, what about
> building/including a JSON output converter for MapFile like context.
> Would lead towards folks running either type of set up for a while.
> Obviously need parsers for both though. Also would help in eventual hard
> conversion to JSON form in the (distant) future?*
>
>
>
> *Bobb*
>
>
>
>
>
> https://github.com/sdlime/mapserver/wiki/MapServer-8.0-Config-File
>
>
>
> Note one advantage of this format over JSON is that comments (single and
> multi-line) are much easier...
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-dev/attachments/20210405/09b28e4d/attachment.html>
More information about the mapserver-dev
mailing list