AW: AW: AW: [Mapserver-inspire] MapServer and INSPIRE

[Stephan Meißl]

Hi Martin

thanks a lot for all the tickets and patches you provided over the last
weeks!

I applied the patches (sometimes slightly adjusted) from the following
tickets to the INSPIRE sandbox: #4144, #4129, #4149, #4148, and #4151.
In addition I renamed wms_metadataurl_href to
wms_inspire_metadataurl_href as suggested and made "wms_style_title" and
"wms_style_<name>_title" multilingual.

Did you receive any feedback on your question in the inspire forum?

Do you see any further open points?

Thanks again,
Stephan


On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 10:20 +0100, Martin Kofahl wrote: 
> Hi Stephan,
> this is my last item from the todo list below. Please take a look at the patch attached to #4151 regarding the keyword vocabulary attribute.
> 
> Best regards,
> Martin
> 
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:34:33 +0100
> > Von: "Stephan Meißl" <stephan at meissl.name>
> > An: Martin Kofahl <M.Kofahl at gmx.net>
> > CC: E.Nash at dvz-mv.de, mapserver-inspire at lists.osgeo.org
> > Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [Mapserver-inspire] MapServer and INSPIRE
> 
> > Hi Martin,
> > 
> > see comments below.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 14:49 +0100, Martin Kofahl wrote: 
> > > Hi Stephan,
> > > 
> > > handling of wms_layer_group looks ok. I did test GetMap and
> > GetFeatureInfo. Now it's much easier to configure full featured groups. However, I did
> > not alter the inspirevs_test service, because it looks as inspire view
> > service may not have named groups. I did post a question on the inspire forum.
> > See
> > http://inspire-forum.jrc.ec.europa.eu/mod/groups/topicposts.php?topic=79913&group_guid=5205#34121. 
> > > 
> > great, it will be good to now the official answer for your post.
> > 
> > > One thing I miss regarding wms_layer_group is the possibility to
> > configures an unnamed group, thus for structuring the capabilities only.
> > > 
> > All names that appear in wms_layer_group but don't have a layer with the
> > same name are treated as unnamed groups. 
> > 
> > > Regarding open ToDos, here are my favorites:
> > > 
> > > - I see GetLegendGraphic requests still not working:
> > http://www.geodaten-mv.de/dienste/inspirevs_test?language=ger&version=1.3.0&service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&sld_version=1.1.0&layer=TN.RailTransportNetwork.RailwayArea&format=image/png&STYLE=inspire_common:DEFAULT
> > > 
> > Strange, GetLegendGraphic requests are working nicely in the test
> > mapfile I generated from your one. 
> > 
> > > - The testsuite I use expects Content-Type application/vnd.ogc.gml
> > instead of text/xml for GML-GetFeatureInfo responses. This has to be verified.
> > > 
> > I agree.
> > 
> > > - AuthorityURL and Identifier may be quired at rootlayer, too
> > > 
> > You mean at service level and root layer?
> > 
> > > - Map -> Web -> wms_metadataurl should be renamed to
> > wms_inspiremetadaurl and Map -> Web -> wms_metadataurl should be available for the root layer.
> > > 
> > Do you need the metadataurl only for the root layer?
> > 
> > > - Handling of keywords should be revised. Instead of wms_inspire_keyword
> > we should talk about wms_keywordvocabulary "ISO" and so parse
> > wms_keywordlist and wms_keywordlist_ISO.
> > > 
> > I agree, keywork handling needs some attention. If you have a good
> > proposal I'd be happy to integrate it :)
> > 
> > > - Style Title should be multilingual, too.
> > > 
> > OK, that shouldn't be too difficult. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I can start with the AuthorityURL and MetadataUrl topics. Someone who
> > can investigate into the GetLegendGraphic problem?
> > 
> > Great, many thanks! As said GetLegendGraphic requests are working for
> > me, so need to reproduce your problem first. Any ideas?
> > 
> > cu
> > Stephan
> > 
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Martin
> > >