MapServer Foundation - Open Letter

Thu Dec 1 00:13:41 PST 2005

Okay, this is my contribution to the naming of the foundation. It can be 
shortened very usefully too!

The Mapping Application Programs Foundation
shortened to
The MAP Foundation

It is also makes it very generic to include everything.
: )
Aniruddha

Bart van den Eijnden wrote:
> Why limit it to webmapping only? This would exclude things like PostGIS, uDIG etc. from joining.
> 
> My suggestion would be Open Source GIS Foundation or Open Source GIS Software Foundation.
> 
> Best regards,
> Bart
> 
> Bart van den Eijnden
> Syncera IT Solutions
> Postbus 270
> 2600 AG  DELFT
> 
> tel.nr.: 015-7512436
> email: BEN at Syncera-ITSolutions.nl
> 
>>>>"Fawcett, David" <David.Fawcett at STATE.MN.US> 11/30/05 5:12 PM >>>
> 
> Gary, 
> 
> Thank you for being open to not using the name MapServer to describe
> MapGuide.  For the foundation, may I suggest:
> 
> Open Source Web Mapping Foundation?
> Web Mapping Foundation?
> 
> 
> Peoples Front for the Liberation of Web Mapping Products?
> 
> David.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: UMN MapServer Users List [mailto:MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Gary Lang
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 10:01 AM
> To: MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU
> Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] MapServer Foundation - Open Letter
> 
> 
> OK. So here's a sincere call for input.
> 
> Here's the rub. Regardless of who made the mistake of suggesting it, I
> liked the name and agreed that we would go with it, so I'll take
> responsibility for MSE.
> 
> On the back of that, we - what can now be seen as the TSC-x cabal + 1
> ADSK person - started drifting from foundation names that had more
> umbrella-like characteristics like osgis.org, mapcommunity, maptools,
> etc. and towards something that focuses on what we were putting out
> together. Based on the fact that both products were named MapServer in
> the root, we went with "MapServer Foundation".
> 
> Now let's assume we change the name back to MapGuide. Why would I now
> want to cripple any hope of adoption by anybody by putting it in a
> foundation (that I helped name) that highlights one map serving product
> over another? 
> 
> So far the community is showing more common sense than we were on this,
> so I'm interested to hear your opinions.
> 
> Gary
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: UMN MapServer Users List [mailto:MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Bill Binko
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 7:44 AM
> To: MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU
> Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] MapServer Foundation - Open Letter
> 
> Hello, everyone
> 
> I'm very sorry to be in this situation twice in one month (HylaFAX is 
> another project I'm involved in, and recently had a possible-fork/naming
> 
> clash), but I thouht I would add one more perspective and perhaps a 
> request.
> 
> When I first read the announcement about the foundation, I had two
> distinct reactions.  First, I sent a note to Frank, who I have found
> best represent the "soul" of the OpenGIS community.  I asked him why I
> so many people I respected (including danmo, and hobu, among others)
> were going along with what looked like a land-grab by a company that has
> historically been less-than-friendly to open source and open standards.
> (I haven't 
> gotten a response, but he's been busy and I feel its appropriate that I 
> not wait any longer to put in my two cents.)
> 
> My second reaction was empowerment.  You see, I have been discussing 
> working with another firm to help them upgrade their online mapping 
> systems.  I've pushed open-source GIS solutions (Mapserver and PostGIS
> in 
> particular), and the response I've gotten is that it's "still in its 
> infancy and has no major players like IBM/Novell in the Linux space."  
> Autodesk (for all of their faults) has given me a winning hand in this 
> game, and I've already setup the meeting to discuss it with my 
> counterpart.
> 
> These reactions seem to map directly to something said earlier:
> Autodesk's involvment and the foundation are major benefits to this
> community, and the poor choice of naming and lack of community
> involvement prior to the launch are major mistakes.  
> 
> The lack of involvement cannot be fixed: it can only be acknowledged and
> learned from.  I think Gary has acknowledged it from Autodesk's
> standpoint, and I'm sure others will admit that Ed's approach ("the
> third
> option") would have been better.  
> 
> As an aside, I think this community is to be congratulated that nobody
> has yet suggested "OpenMapserver" or setting up a fork on sf.net or any
> of the other threats that I've seen in other contexts: it shows that it
> is not the code or even the Man-Years that are of value to this group,
> but the community that builds, supports, and uses this great tool suite.
> 
> I was surprised to read that Frank and Dan were both involved in moving 
> _towards_ the Mapserver Enterprise naming.  It is one of very few
> mistakes 
> I've seen from them, and I suppose they were due: however, it is a 
> mistake, nonetheless.  The good news is that it is a fixable mistake.
> 
> Frank, you have one of the most authoritative voices in this community,
> and I'm sure Autodesk has considered your position in choosing this
> naming path.  I think they would do so again, if you were to suggest
> that the damage being done to the community by this error will outwiegh
> any branding benefits they may gain.
> 
> It might be useful to remember that many of the best Open Source
> software 
> out there has been through naming conflicts: Phoenix/FireBird/FireFox, 
> FlexFAX/HylaFAX, etc.  They are painful, but not deadly.
> 
> Autodesk, welcome aboard: I'm sorry you're initiation has been painful, 
> but if you stick with it, this really will be a rewarding experience for
> 
> you.
> 
> Bill
> 
> 

-- 
ANIRUDDHA S. KHADKIKAR Ph.D.
.....................................................
Digital Information Resource Centre
National Chemical Laboratory
Dr. Homi Bhabha Road
Pune 411008, INDIA
.....................................................
Phone : 91 020 25893457 (Off)
Fax   : 91 020 25893973
Email : as.khadkikar at ncl.res.in
Web   :  http://www.ncbi.org.in
.....................................................

*****************************************************************
This email is virus free by TrendMicro Inter Scan Security Suite.
*****************************************************************