Keeping MapServer MapServer (Re: Will someone summarize this?)

[Fawcett, David]

+1

-----Original Message-----
From: UMN MapServer Users List [mailto:MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU] On
Behalf Of Kralidis,Tom [Burlington]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 9:07 AM
To: MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU
Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] Keeping MapServer MapServer (Re: Will
someone summarize this?)


+1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: UMN MapServer Users List
> [mailto:MAPSERVER-USERS at lists.umn.edu] On Behalf Of Jeff McKenna
> Sent: Thursday, 01 December, 2005 10:04
> To: MAPSERVER-USERS at lists.umn.edu
> Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] Keeping MapServer 
> MapServer (Re: Will someone summarize this?)
> 
> 
> I'd like to have a small voice as well: as a mapserver user and
> documenter, I vote for "MapServer".
> 
> jeff
> 
> 
> Sean Gillies wrote:
> > On Dec 1, 2005, at 7:33 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> > 
> >> On 12/1/05, Aniruddha S. Khadkikar <as.khadkikar at ncl.res.in> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Have we agreed that:
> >>>
> >>> Mapserver retain its identity as before (I vote for that
> - in case
> >>> polling is on).
> >>
> >>
> >> Aniruddha,
> >>
> >> I, for one, don't agree with keeping MapServer named just
> >> "MapServer". Clearly a number of people do feel this way.
> > 
> > 
> > Frank,
> > 
> > I think it's clear as can be made without packing us all in a room
> > and
> > asking for a show of hands: outside of the foundation cabal (and  
> > perhaps AU attendees) people want the original MapServer to remain  
> > "MapServer". Do you not see this?
> > 
> > Let's make it so. It's the right thing to do.
> > 
> > cheers,
> > Sean
>