Foundation and Mapserver MAP file manag e tool
Frank Warmerdam
warmerdam at POBOX.COM
Thu Dec 15 06:51:58 PST 2005
On 12/15/05, Gerry Creager N5JXS <gerry.creager at tamu.edu> wrote:
> I'm getting in late on this, but what're the chances of using GML for
> this functionality instead of trying to roll our own? GML's already OGC
> recognized. Done right, it could cover most of the "stuff" we're
> interested in, and could be readily extended (and OGC ratified,
> probably) if we needed to.
Gerry,
I think it would be wrong to try and make the mapfile itself be a
proper GML document. A map is not a feature, so why force
it to be?
However, one could make the case that inline features ought to
be expressed in GML if we had an XML format mapfile. I'm not
sure *I* would be the one to make that case, but it could be made.
Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent
More information about the MapServer-users
mailing list