[MSF-Discuss] Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] Autodesk product naming poll
Paul Spencer
pspencer at DMSOLUTIONS.CA
Sat Dec 24 20:54:17 PST 2005
Sean,
perhaps it came off that way, but it wasn't intended to be
deliberately obtuse. I understand your point, and I was actually
making a general observation based on comments I've read from several/
most of the core team. As I said, this wasn't a new argument on my
part to prop up my increasingly unpopular opinions on the naming
thing, just a general observation. My apologies if I offended.
Cheers and Seasons Greetings ...
Paul
On 24-Dec-05, at 5:02 PM, sgillies at frii.com wrote:
> Paul,
>
> My point is that IMO changing an imperfect name can be *much worse*
> than
> keeping it. Did you not get this from my email, or are you being
> purposefully obtuse?
>
> Merry Christmas,
> Sean
>
>> Has anyone else noticed that a common sentiment that MapServer is not
>> a particularly great name? It seems the core developers, in
>> particular, are not that invested in the name. Seems weird that the
>> community is working so hard to defend something that the 'owners'
>> are not even that sure they want to keep. This is just an
>> observation, not a new argument :)
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> On 23-Dec-05, at 7:52 PM, sgillies at frii.com wrote:
>>
>>> Gary,
>>>
>>> I simply think that trying to rename the MapServer project is
>>> detrimental
>>> to the project, and I've really appreciated that you're more
>>> sensitive to
>>> this than most of the open letter signers. I'm not in love with the
>>> name
>>> MapServer by any means, but it would best be left unchanged both
>>> for the
>>> health of the project and to provide some continuity from the
>>> existing
>>> MapServer community. Frankly, I don't care what the foundation is
>>> named so
>>> long as it doesn't trample on any other open source project or
>>> foundation.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> Sean
>>>
>>>> Sean,
>>>>
>>>> Would moving MapServer from UMinn to the, say, "Open Source
>>>> Geospatial
>>>> Foundation" be asking for trouble compared to putting it into the
>>>> "MapServer Foundation"? If not, why not?
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: discuss-bounces at lists.mapserverfoundation.org on behalf of
>>>> sgillies at frii.com
>>>> Sent: Thu 12/22/2005 6:05 PM
>>>> To: Attila Csipa
>>>> Cc: mapserver-users at lists.umn.edu;
>>>> discuss at lists.mapserverfoundation.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [MSF-Discuss] Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] Autodesk
>>>> product
>>>> naming poll
>>>>
>>>> Attila,
>>>>
>>>> I have customers who have been equally confused by this project
>>>> name
>>>> churning. A foundation could be a good thing, but trying to rebrand
>>>> MapServer at the same time is asking for trouble.
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>> Sean
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> discuss mailing list
>>>> discuss at lists.mapserverfoundation.org
>>>> http://lists.mapserverfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> discuss mailing list
>>> discuss at lists.mapserverfoundation.org
>>> http://lists.mapserverfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>> |Paul Spencer pspencer at dmsolutions.ca |
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>> |Applications & Software Development |
>> |DM Solutions Group Inc http://www.dmsolutions.ca/|
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Paul Spencer pspencer at dmsolutions.ca |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|Applications & Software Development |
|DM Solutions Group Inc http://www.dmsolutions.ca/|
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the MapServer-users
mailing list