Shapefile vs. DB connections
Paul Ramsey
pramsey at REFRACTIONS.NET
Wed Jun 22 09:24:17 PDT 2005
No, we only did SDE, and a couple of Shapefile tests. But we could
repurpose the test data and test harness for a Shape/PostGIS test.
Jeff McKenna wrote:
> I wonder if Brock Anderson looked at that as part of his MapServer vs
> ArcIMS comparison. I know he was specifically looking at SDE, but i am
> just curious if he ran any postgis tests, because i remember from one of
> his MUM3 slides that he had shapefile numbers.
>
> jeff
>
>
> Paul Ramsey wrote:
>
>> That is the conventional wisdom, and I have repeated it myself many
>> times (on the basis of tests we did four years ago), but John
>> Hagstrand has anecdotally told me that under concurrent load he finds
>> his PostGIS is faster. So I think some new benchmarking is in order.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> Kralidis,Tom [Burlington] wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Does anyone have any info on comparing performance between serving
>>> MapServer w/ shapefiles vs. DB (i.e. PostGIS)? I'm guessing shapefiles
>>> are quicker.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> ..Tom
>>
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the MapServer-users
mailing list