About ShapeTree and Raster TileIndex
Akio Neuchi
neuchi at TCI-COM.BIZ
Fri May 13 03:03:13 PDT 2005
Hello to all,
I just made a *.qix file from *.shp file for Raster TileIndex images --
around 800 gif images,
and tested with and without shape tree. The result was there is no
difference in processing speed.
The procedure was,
gdaltindex MSRAS_12000.shp MSRAS_12000/*.gif,
shptree MSRAS_12000.shp,
and I got MSRAS_12000.qix.
(Under MSRAS_12000 directory there are 800 gif and wld files.)
I wonder if I am following the right procedure, and if so,
why there is no difference on the processing.
In addition, I have around 100 of Vector TileIndex shape directories,
and If ShapeTree really works, I am planning to build *.qix for each Vector
shapes.
My OUTPUTFORMAT amd Raster layer are like these:
OUTPUTFORMAT
NAME gif
MIMETYPE "image/gif"
DRIVER "GD/GIF"
EXTENSION "gif"
IMAGEMODE RGB
# IMAGEMODE PC256
TRANSPARENT FALSE
FORMATOPTION "INTERLACE=OFF"
END
### RASTER Layer
LAYER
NAME "MSRAS_12000"
GROUP "B_RASTER"
TILEINDEX "MSRAS_12000.qix"
# TILEINDEX "MSRAS_12000.shp"
TILEITEM "Location"
TYPE RASTER
# STATUS ON
STATUS DEFAULT
MINSCALE 50
MAXSCALE 5000000
PROJECTION
"proj=latlong"
# "init=epsg:26915"
END
END
Thank you for your suggestions.
Akio
More information about the MapServer-users
mailing list