ADSK and the MapServer Foundation - tying the threads together

[Gary Lang]

The "enterprise" moniker idea came from a MS person, but we sell to
enterprise customers today with even less OGC support than we have in
MSE. Since we sell to them today a product with less of these features
it didn't seem too presumptuous.

 

It would be interesting to see a gap analysis. My boss is on the OGC
board, and they seem happy with our progress in this area.

 

In the rush to do all this by our AU event here in Orlando, many
shortcuts were taken, including with documentation. Sorry about that.
The first official release of the open source code will take place in
January, and it should be better by then.

 

Gary 

 

  _____  

From: Ethan Alpert [mailto:ealpert at digitalglobe.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 3:33 PM
To: Gary Lang; MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU
Subject: RE: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] ADSK and the MapServer Foundation -
tying the threads together

I'm curious why you want to call your product Mapserver Enterprise when
it clearly doesn't have near the level of functionality that the *real*
Mapserver has? Could you answer this please? No OGC support, for
example, which is core to other "Enterprise" mapping applications. I'm
not finding adaquate documentation of features online but MSE doesn't
look like it provides much of the functionality commonly associated with
the Mapserver brand.

 

-e

	-----Original Message-----
	From: UMN MapServer Users List
[mailto:MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU] On Behalf Of Gary Lang
	Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 4:13 PM
	To: MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU
	Subject: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] ADSK and the MapServer Foundation
- tying the threads together

	Folks,

	 

	I want to answer questions and continue to try to learn what the
concerns are. I thought I'd sit down and write a longer mail about 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20051129/e989c1f5/attachment.htm>