MapServer Vs GeoServer...WFS-T support

[Kralidis,Tom [Burlington]]

+1.  I think they would be very complimentary, as a GeoServer WFS-T
instance would have different access control rules than that of a WMS,
so you can set them up at separate URLs, and operating on the same
underlying data.

..Tom


> -----Original Message-----
> From: UMN MapServer Users List 
> [mailto:MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU] On Behalf Of Steve Lime
> Sent: 12 February, 2007 3:01 PM
> To: MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU
> Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] MapServer Vs 
> GeoServer...WFS-T support
> 
> It's not like one can't use multiple tools... ;-)
> 
> Steve
> 
> >>> Carola Jesch <cjesch at CCT.LSU.EDU> 2/12/2007 8:06:20 AM >>>
> I am sorry to hear that! Would have been to nice....
> Carola
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Carola Jesch
> Wetland Biogeochemistry Institute
> Department of Oceanography and Coastal Science Louisiana 
> State University
> e-mail: cjesch at cct.lsu.edu 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: UMN MapServer Users List
> > [mailto:MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU] On Behalf Of Gerry Creager
> > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 7:04 AM
> > To: MAPSERVER-USERS at LISTS.UMN.EDU
> > Subject: Re: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] MapServer Vs GeoServer
> > 
> > Aw, man!  That's too bad.  I've some interesting uses for WFS-T!
> > 
> > gerry
> > 
> > Tim Bowden wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 01:20 -0600, Jedi Knight wrote:
> > >> Will MapServer support for WFS-T ?
> > >> Thanks!
> > > 
> > > There are no plans to do so.  See:
> > > 
> >
> http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/docs/howto/wfs_server/#to-do-items-and-kn
> 
> > > own-limitations
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Tim Bowden
> > 
> > --
> > Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager at tamu.edu 
> > Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University	
> > Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.862.3983
> > Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX
> 77843
> > 
>