[mapserver-users] MapServer v. 4.10.0 featureid problem

[Kralidis,Tom [Burlington]]

Hi Brian,

What's your underlying data?  If there's anyway you can package a small
testcase, I can do a local test.

..Tom
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Mixon [mailto:mixon at waterstoneinc.com] 
> Sent: 17 April, 2008 12:24 PM
> To: Kralidis,Tom [Burlington]; mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> Cc: Brenton Wonders; Russell Huff
> Subject: RE: [mapserver-users] MapServer v. 4.10.0 featureid problem
> 
> Hi Tom,
> 
> Yes, it does. It's an Arc field that is present in all our data.
> 
> Thanks,
> Brian 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kralidis,Tom [Burlington] [mailto:Tom.Kralidis at ec.gc.ca]
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 10:11 AM
> To: Brian Mixon; mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> Cc: Brenton Wonders; Russell Huff
> Subject: RE: [mapserver-users] MapServer v. 4.10.0 featureid problem
> 
>  
> Does the column/field "fid" exist in your data?
> 
> ..Tom
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> 	From: mapserver-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:mapserver-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of 
> Brian Mixon
> 	Sent: 17 April, 2008 11:51 AM
> 	To: mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> 	Cc: Brenton Wonders; Russell Huff
> 	Subject: [mapserver-users] MapServer v. 4.10.0 featureid problem
> 	
> 	
> 	Hello,
> 	 
> 	I'm a MapServer newbie and am having trouble with a WFS 
> v. 1.0.0 request. I'm trying to have all the features for a 
> particular layer returned (which happens successfully) with 
> the fid (feature id) included as well (does not happen). I've 
> included the gml_featureid 'fid' tag in the layer's metadata 
> section of the mapfile but only receive the
> following warning the the xml/gml response:    <!--  WARNING: 
> FeatureId
> item 'fid' not found in typename 'senate_districts'.   -->
> 	 
> 	I've searched and read the various tickets that claim 
> this problem is fixed so I'm wondering what I'm doing wrong? 
> 	 
> 	Any information to point me in the right direction 
> would be greatly appreciated.
> 	 
> 	Regards,
> 	Brian Mixon
> 
> 
> 
>