[mapserver-users] Reprojection image quality
Brent Fraser
bfraser at geoanalytic.com
Tue Sep 23 07:40:52 PDT 2008
Benoît,
Try some of the other "-r" options such as "cubic"
Brent Fraser
Benoît Andrieu wrote:
> Hi all !
>
> Once again, I'm here !!
>
> So my results :
> - tps has no effects at all,
>
> - generating a merge with gdalwarp on a small number of files
> or
> generating a merge with gdalwarp on all the files plus specifying the
> same extent of the small number of files
> does not give me the same result.
> In the first case, the image is great with no artefacts, in the second
> case the image is not good at all with duplicated groups of pixels along
> vertical and horizontal lines. One could see the results on the same
> files as previously :
> http://benoit.andrieu.free.fr/mapserver/Clipboard02.png
>
> Has anyone any tips for me ?? ^^
>
> Benoît
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Benoît Andrieu <mailto:bea at ixsea.com>
> *To:* mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> <mailto:mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:33 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [mapserver-users] Reprojection image quality
>
> Hi all !
>
> I am trying to play with the parameters of gdalwarp.
>
> It seems that the tps option gives better output result than
> omitting this parameter.
> I just tried on a subset of my data and the resulting picture is
> very nice comparing to the previous. Right now, I am trying it on
> the whole dataset.
>
> By the way, could someone explain what it really does ?
> Is this a better/different algorithm ?
>
> -tps:
> Force use of thin plate spline transformer based on available GCPs.
>
> Benoît
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Benoît Andrieu <mailto:bea at ixsea.com>
> *To:* mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> <mailto:mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 23, 2008 9:24 AM
> *Subject:* [mapserver-users] Reprojection image quality
>
> Hello guys !
>
> I currently have some problems in the quality of the images
> produced by GDAL/Mapserver.
>
> We are using MapServer to serve raster imagery to NASA Worldwind.
> Our files are in UTM and Worldwind needs WGS84 images so we do
> reprojection on the fly.
> Using this, we can clearly see image quality artefacts between
> Worldwind (using WGS84, no choice) and a custom internal tool
> (showing original data).
>
> I can reproduce the problem using gdalwarp tool using a very
> simple command line :
> gdalwarp -multi -t_srs EPSG:4326 -srcnodata 0 -dstnodata 0 -r
> near %FileSrc%/*_p_*8bit.tif %FileDest%
>
> You can see the result on
> http://benoit.andrieu.free.fr/mapserver/Clipboard02.png : on the
> right, the original image and on the left, the resulting output.
>
> I suspect that using some others settings, I could improve the
> quality on gdalwarp's output in a first time and on mapserver's
> output in a second time but I don't know where to start...
>
> So if anyone could help or suggest anything, he will be welcome !!!
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Benoît
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
More information about the MapServer-users
mailing list