[mapserver-users] Getting mad - copyright notice
Steve Lime
Steve.Lime at dnr.state.mn.us
Sat Aug 15 05:29:33 PDT 2009
Wierd, what does the whole mapfile, or at least the other non-layer pieces look like? The
TRANSFORM directive forces the layer to be handled in pixel coordinates and really shouldn't
be affected by scale at all. Assuming this is drawn last there should be no issues with
label collisions.
Are you using label priority at all?
Why the projection obj?
Steve
>>> "Lars Westerlind" <lars.westerlind at enera.se> 08/14/09 1:26 AM >>>
Hello,
Was playing with the suggested copyright notice, and it worked very well
- first mapfile.
Afters extensive testing it appears that below a certain scale my layer
doesn't show up. Or rather; when the BBOX parameter has for instance
BBOX=11.0,56.0,12.0,57.0 it shows, but not with
BBOX=12.00,57.64,12.09,57.68. Due to the logg (DEBUG level 5) the layer
is not rendered at all.
Can anyone give a clue? Should there be fiddling with MINDISTANCE and
such?
My Layer definition:
LAYER
NAME "Base" # we should always have one layer "base"
METADATA
"wms_title" "Base"
END
STATUS DEFAULT
TYPE ANNOTATION
PROJECTION
"init=epsg:4326" ##recommended
END
TRANSFORM ll #set the image origin to be lower left
FEATURE
POINTS
70 -10 #set the offset from lower left position in pixels
END
TEXT " (c) 2009 Enera International and www.openstreetmap.org" #this
is your displaying text
END
CLASS
LABEL #defines the font, colors etc. of the text
FONT "arial"
TYPE TRUETYPE
SIZE 8
BUFFER 1
COLOR 0 0 0
BACKGROUNDCOLOR 255 255 255
FORCE TRUE
END
END
UNITS PIXELS #sets the units for the feature object
END
_______________________________________________
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
More information about the MapServer-users
mailing list