[mapserver-users] Status on ticket 2582?

[paalkr]

Hi!

Thanks Daniel for taking responsibility for this issue, which has been
around for far to long :-) I agree that ticket 1952 discusses a more
flexible functionality, but I don't think we need to make this more
complicated than it is already. I can't see a situation where you would like
to hide a layer from one service type, but not in an other (but thats my
opinion). Fixing the 2582 bug would satisfy many of the user needs on this
issue.

Taking the GROUP functionality into consideration seems to be important, as
this possibly could cause some mixup if a hidden layer is inside a group
layer. What if all layers inside a GROUP is hidden? Should the group layer
still be exposed in the capabilities document? I'd say yes, but other may
have a different opinion.

Regards,
Pål Kristensen


Martin Kofahl wrote:
> 
> Perfect! Although the solution described in ticket 1952 might be more 
> flexible for future use.
> 
> Daniel Morissette wrote:
>> paalkr wrote:
>>> Hi all devs!
>>>
>>> What is the status on ticket 
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/2582
>>> 2582 ? Is this going to be included in 5.4?
>>>
>> 
>> Yes, we'll take care of it for 5.4.
>> 
>> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Status-on-ticket-2582--tp2337548p2341220.html
Sent from the Mapserver - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.