[mapserver-users] Mapserver MS SQL Server Spacial

[Tamas Szekeres]

We would normally require an exact measure to interpret this conclusion by
describing the test environment settings and the data source settings in
both cases. You cannot easily place the equal-sign between the performance
of a cgi, fast cgi, or a mapscript application or even a single point layer
may highly outperform a layer with complex symbology for instance.

Best regards,

Tamas



2009/1/9 Roland Klabunde <roland.klabunde at freenet.de>

> No, not at all. It is just an impression. I was comparing MapDotNet Ux vs.
> MS24W. The latter is much more less performing...
>
> Tamas Szekeres schrieb:
>
>>
>> 2009/1/9 Roland Klabunde <roland.klabunde at freenet.de <mailto:
>> roland.klabunde at freenet.de>>
>>
>>
>>    ...but it is by far not that "performant",  as e.g. MapDotNet
>>    is.... I'm sorry to say that, but that's the way it is..
>>
>>
>> Do you have some measures to compare the performance? As far as I know
>> MapDotNet use this same driver along with MapServer as the drawing kernel.
>> The mssql2008 plugin have been contributed by ISC furthermore.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Tamas
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapserver-users mailing list
>> mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20090109/c16cb096/attachment.html