[mapserver-users] MapServer on Intel Atom?

kreshna_iceheart at yahoo.com kreshna_iceheart at yahoo.com
Tue Jan 13 03:24:56 PST 2009


Update: I saw an Intel Atom benchmark here:
http://laptoping.com/intel-atom-benchmark.html

It has about similar performance with Pentium III Tualatin (1.13 GHz), so I think it's not really bad for MapServer (and postgreSQL), isn't it? I mean, most open source applications don't have resource-hogging overhead, so it's quite okay, isn't it?

-Kresh


--- On Tue, 1/13/09, kreshna_iceheart at yahoo.com <kreshna_iceheart at yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: kreshna_iceheart at yahoo.com <kreshna_iceheart at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [mapserver-users] MapServer on Intel Atom?
> To: mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org, "Dan Little" <danlittle at yahoo.com>
> Date: Tuesday, January 13, 2009, 5:35 AM
> Hi, thanks.
> 
> The vectors are quite simple. I've never experienced
> slow down when displayed vector data, not even on an old
> Toshiba M20 laptop.
> 
> Raster, on the other hand, is always the biggest problem.
> Compared to polygons, my raster is always slower to zoom, to
> pan, etc (despite the size is only 500 Mb). Is displaying
> raster more CPU-intensive or memory-intensive? If I'm
> using Intel Atom, will my raster be affected severely?
> 
> Also, can using bigger RAM (let say, 2GB or so) compensate
> for the lack of processing power of Intel Atom?
> 
> Thanks again,
> -Kresh
> 
> 
> --- On Mon, 1/12/09, Dan Little <danlittle at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: Dan Little <danlittle at yahoo.com>
> > Subject: Re: [mapserver-users] MapServer on Intel
> Atom?
> > To: kreshna_iceheart at yahoo.com,
> mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> > Date: Monday, January 12, 2009, 9:18 PM
> > I think the atom will be more than adequate...
> depending on
> > the dataset. :-)
> > 
> > Serving 100 points is significantly less intensive
> than
> > serving 100 city-boundary polygons.
> > 
> > 
> > (Oops forgot to send to the list)
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > > From: "kreshna_iceheart at yahoo.com"
> > <kreshna_iceheart at yahoo.com>
> > > To: mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> > > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 8:09:15 PM
> > > Subject: [mapserver-users] MapServer on Intel
> Atom?
> > > 
> > > I'll be doing a lot of MapServer demo in the
> > future. I'm quite interested in 
> > > Intel Atom-based subnotebooks for the purpose
> (like
> > Lenovo IdeaPad S10), since 
> > > they are light and mobile.
> > > 
> > > However, I wonder if Intel Atom is adequate to
> run
> > MapServer. The MapServer will 
> > > be run on either ms4w on Windows XP, or directly
> on
> > Linux. The layers are stored 
> > > on postGIS (there are fifteen layers or so), and
> there
> > is also a 476 megabytes 
> > > raster file in .TIFF format.
> > > 
> > > Will Intel Atom be adequate for the purpose? Will
> 2GB
> > of memory help? Has anyone 
> > > ever done such thing before?
> > > 
> > > Many thanks,
> > > -Kresh
> > > 
> > > 
> > >       
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > mapserver-users mailing list
> > > mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> > >
> >
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users


      



More information about the MapServer-users mailing list