[mapserver-users] Status on ticket 2582?

[Rahkonen Jukka]

Hi,

Don't know about discussions, but it would be nice to be able to hide the scale depended members of a group (use case 2).

-Jukka Rahkonen-

> -----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
> Lähettäjä: mapserver-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org 
> [mailto:mapserver-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] Puolesta 
> Martin Kofahl
> Lähetetty: 13. maaliskuuta 2009 11:17
> Vastaanottaja: paalkr; mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> Aihe: Re: [mapserver-users] Status on ticket 2582?
> 
> Is there still interest in discussing 
> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/wiki/HidingLayersInOGCWebServices ?
> 
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:40:50 -0800 (PST)
> > Von: paalkr <pal.kristensen at statkart.no>
> > An: mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> > Betreff: Re: [mapserver-users] Status on ticket 2582?
> 
> > 
> > Great!
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Pål Kristensen
> > 
> > 
> > Alan Boudreault wrote:
> > > 
> > > I'll make the RFC in the next days.
> > > 
> > > Alan
> > > 
> > > On February 23, 2009 01:09:36 pm Steve Lime wrote:
> > >> Hi guys: I think we need a small RFC on this issue. The 
> impacts are 
> > >> too broad to handle without a formal plan. Anyone care 
> to take the 
> > >> lead?
> > >>
> > >> Steve
> > >>
> > >> >>> On 2/22/2009 at 4:51 PM, in message
> > >>
> > >> <1235343099022-2369505.post at n2.nabble.com>,
> > >>
> > >> paalkr <pal.kristensen at statkart.no> wrote:
> > >> > Hi!
> > >> >
> > >> > Good idea, this could even make the dump == false / 
> true for OWS
> > >>
> > >> redundant.
> > >>
> > >> > Adding wfs_disable_request 'all' would effectively prevent wfs
> > >>
> > >> support.
> > >>
> > >> > Adding wms_disable_request 'GetFeatureinfo' would be 
> the same as 
> > >> > dump
> > >>
> > >> ==
> > >>
> > >> > false on a WMS layer.
> > >> >
> > >> > I think the following situations are the most common where this
> > >>
> > >> "hiding"
> > >>
> > >> > functionality would be needed:
> > >> >
> > >> > 1) Adding a "copyright" statement to a map. Hiding the 
> layer and
> > >>
> > >> setting
> > >>
> > >> > status to default will insure that the label is rendered 
> > >> > regardless
> > >>
> > >> of
> > >>
> > >> > requested layers.
> > >> > 2) Exposing different raster resolution layers as one "logical"
> > >>
> > >> layer. This
> > >>
> > >> > can be achieved in two different ways
> > >> > a) adding all the raster layers (status == default) to 
> a group as
> > >>
> > >> hidden
> > >>
> > >> > layers (the group will (should) then become hidden as 
> well), then 
> > >> > add
> > >>
> > >> a
> > >>
> > >> > "dummy" layer (which don't draws anything) with the 
> same name as 
> > >> > the
> > >>
> > >> group.
> > >>
> > >> > Requesting the dummy layer would actually also request 
> the group
> > >>
> > >> because the
> > >>
> > >> > name is identical.
> > >> > b) adding all the layers as hidden single layers (status == 
> > >> > default)
> > >>
> > >> and use
> > >>
> > >> > the requires mechanism to set dependencies to a "dummy" layer.
> > >> > 3) Hiding tileindex layers. Setting up the tileindex as a 
> > >> > separate
> > >>
> > >> layer is
> > >>
> > >> > the only way of adding a tileindex to e.g PostgreSQL atm.
> > >> > 4) Enable / expose some layers only for certain service types 
> > >> > (wms,
> > >>
> > >> wfs,
> > >>
> > >> > sos, wcs)
> > >> > 5) Limit the "users" ability to interact and change the map
> > >>
> > >> appearance.
> > >>
> > >> > Anyway. I hope that either Martins patch is added to 
> 5.4 or that 
> > >> > we
> > >>
> > >> agree on
> > >>
> > >> > something similar, in time to reach the 5.4 release.
> > >> >
> > >> > Regards,
> > >> > Pål Kristensen
> > >> >
> > >> > Martin Kofahl wrote:
> > >> >> Hi,
> > >> >> it becomes apparent that we try to solve different issues with
> > >>
> > >> hiding,
> > >>
> > >> >> ignoring and so on. We should try to find an implementation 
> > >> >> which
> > >>
> > >> also
> > >>
> > >> >> solves related tickets but is open for future requirements.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> So couldn't we use a metadata like [service]_disable_request 
> > >> >> which
> > >>
> > >> lists
> > >>
> > >> >> all request type (per service) MapServer shouldn't 
> support for a
> > >>
> > >> layer?
> > >>
> > >> >> Maybe expanded with the request type 'all'. Possible examples:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>      wms_disable_request 'all'
> > >> >>      wms_disable_request 'getcapabilities getfeatureinfo'
> > >> >>
> > >> >> This should solve tickets 337, 1952, 2582.
> > >> >> What do you think?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Martin
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > View this message in context:
> > >> > 
> http://n2.nabble.com/Status-on-ticket-2582--tp2337548p2369505.htm
> > >> > l Sent from the Mapserver - User mailing list archive at 
> > >> > Nabble.com.
> > >> >
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > mapserver-users mailing list
> > >> > mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> > >> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> mapserver-users mailing list
> > >> mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> > >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > mapserver-users mailing list
> > > mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://n2.nabble.com/Status-on-ticket-2582--tp2337548p2374868.html
> > Sent from the Mapserver - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > mapserver-users mailing list
> > mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>