[mapserver-users] Display performance

[Chris Jackson]

Steve

That saves some work, but how long would you expect one that size to load?
I have just realised (admittedly not looked at the data for a couple of
years) that it is actually 170,000 records - takes about 20 secs to load -
sound reasonable?

Chris

On 2 September 2010 20:50, Lime, Steve D (DNR) <Steve.Lime at state.mn.us>wrote:

>  That’s not that big a dataset. Probably faster from a local shapefile.
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> *From:* mapserver-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:
> mapserver-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *Chris Jackson
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 02, 2010 2:29 PM
> *To:* mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> *Subject:* [mapserver-users] Display performance
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> I wondered if anyone knew if displaying a 50,000 polygon dataset would be
> significantly faster if called from a database rather than a spatially
> indexed shapefile, or is it a similar overhead for both.
> Thanks
> Chris
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20100902/d6266894/attachment-0001.html