[mapserver-users] Question on rfc 86
Tamas Szekeres
szekerest at gmail.com
Mon May 16 05:56:31 PDT 2011
Hi Daniel,
Good point. I've just been waiting for someone more proficient than me, who
confirms that this approach makes sense ;-)
Best regards,
Tamas
2011/5/16 Daniel Morissette <dmorissette at mapgears.com>
> On 11-05-14 03:21 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
>
>> However the desired scale range (MINSCALEDENOM, MAXSCALEDENOM) could
>> indeed be taken into account when accessing the source layers, by using
>> a minor change.
>>
>>
> If that's not the case already then I think MINSCALEDENOM, MAXSCALEDENOM
> from the source layer should be taken into account by default with UNION
> layers. i.e. when one sets up a layer with min/max scale, it is normally
> because the data is not appropriate for use at other scales, so I see no
> reason to expose via in the union layer outside of those scales either.
>
> My 0.02$
>
> --
> Daniel Morissette
> http://www.mapgears.com/
> Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20110516/234e92cc/attachment.htm>
More information about the MapServer-users
mailing list