[mapserver-users] On a wms-request force the add of a layer when another layer is requested

[Andrea Peri]

Hi Jukka,

The REQUIRES element work this mode:

Layer2 is visible only when also Layer1 is in the request

So a request like this:

...&layers=layer1,layer2

is visible layer1 + layer2

In a request like this:
...&layers=layer2

nothing is visible.

Instead I need this other possibility:

on a request

...&layers=layer2

the result visible is:

Layer1 + Layer2

Thx,

Andrea.

2012/5/29 Rahkonen Jukka <Jukka.Rahkonen at mmmtike.fi>

> **
> Hi,
>
> Layer2 should come always together with Layer1 If you put this line in
> Layer2 definitions
>
>  REQUIRES "[Layer1]"
>
> Without testing I cannot guarantee that I remember it right.  For me the
> logic of keyword "REQUIRES" feels reversed because my brain says that
> Layer2 is rather required by Layer1. Perhaps native English speakers think
> it is OK and explicit like it is now.
>
> -Jukka Rahkonen-
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> Andrea Peri  wrote:
>  Hi,
> I'm using MapServer trunk version.
>
> Thx to Stephen Woodbridge response,
> (http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/2012-May/072326.html)
>
> I'm able to avoid the use of a single layer of a group.
>
> Now I have another (perhaps) more complex question.
>
> I need to realize a map file with a configuration that
> when the Layer1 is ligh-on from the user (using a wms request), the map
> response will contains also another "Layer2".
>
> But I cannot use the "group" element because the two layers (Layer1 and
> layer2) are not in the same group.
> They are in two distinct and different groups.
>
> So I guess to allow this should be available a command like "requires",
> but that force the light-on of Layer2 instead of deny the light-on of the
> layer1.
>
> Is this available on mapServer ?
>
> thx,
>
> --
> -----------------
> Andrea Peri
> . . . . . . . . .
> qwerty àèìòù
> -----------------
>
>


-- 
-----------------
Andrea Peri
. . . . . . . . .
qwerty àèìòù
-----------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20120529/0c2ed872/attachment.htm>