[mapserver-users] Mapfile VS MapScript performance

[Umberto Nicoletti]

The python wrapper is actually ~ 6 lines ;-)



On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Mike Saunt <mikesaunt at gmail.com> wrote:

> As the cgi is robust and heavily tested I would think you would save
> massive amounts of developer time in not writing python wrapper code too!
> On Nov 7, 2012 8:42 AM, "Umberto Nicoletti" <umberto.nicoletti at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I have tested cgi against python mapscript (with mod_python) and the
>> performance improvement, as expected, is massive.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Spirifer <ready945 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would to use MapServer to create WMS/WFS services.
>>>
>>> I think to compare 2 systems to produce services:
>>> 1) Apache + MapServer CGI + static mapfile (.map)
>>> 2) Apache + MapScript PHP + map configuration in cache
>>>
>>> Somebody has tested the performance between the mapfile and MapScript ?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Mapfile-VS-MapScript-performance-tp5014463.html
>>> Sent from the Mapserver - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mapserver-users mailing list
>>> mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mapserver-users mailing list
>> mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20121107/b06e363c/attachment.htm>