[mapserver-users] File GDB performance vs Shapefile Performance

[Simon Mercier]

you should try tile4ms or ogrtindex instead of using ogr connection.

http://mapserver.org/utilities/tile4ms.html
http://www.gdal.org/ogrtindex.html

simon



On 2/1/2016 3:39 PM, Mark Volz wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> My interactive mapping application is currently using Shapefiles to 
> store the contour lines.  At 1.5 GB the Shapefiles are rather large.  
> Instead I am considering using a File Geodatabase which will only take 
> up about 500 MB.
>
> Is there a significant performance loss between Shapefiles and File 
> Geodatabases?  And are there any performance tips and tricks for using 
> File Geodatabases?
>
> Thanks
>
> Sincerely,
>
> *Mark Volz, GISP*
>
> *Lyon County GIS Coordinator*
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mapserver-users mailing list
> mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users

-- 
Simon Mercier
mapgears.com
Quebec: +1 418.476.7139 #101
Toll Free: +1 888.696.5056 #101

evouala.com - Location Intelligence Made Easy

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20160201/27e42bf9/attachment.htm>